How does Shakespeare present the relationship between ‘Romeo and Juliet’ in the early part of the play Essays

How does Shakespeare present the connection among ‘Romeo and Juliet’ in the early piece of the play Essays How does Shakespeare present the connection among ‘Romeo and Juliet’ in the early piece of the play Paper How does Shakespeare present the connection among ‘Romeo and Juliet’ in the early piece of the play Paper Paper Topic: Romeo and Juliet In the sixteenth century a man centric culture, where men ruled ladies, implied that ladies had next to no say in relationships. At the point when Shakespeare previously presented ‘Romeo and Juliet’ just because their sort of relationship was unbelievable and dubious. Organized relationships were normal at the time contingent upon your economic wellbeing and love had no significance. Ladies had no rights and were seen as the ‘property’ of the spouse. Men likewise had no regard for ladies and regularly struck different towns for spouses. At the time wedding at 12 years old gave off an impression of being typical, but at this point is scowled at, yet seeing this from a lacking, social nation would at present have all the earmarks of being ordinary. Shakespeare introduced connections by the manner in which the characters associated, utilizing sensational gadgets and furthermore further upgraded it with the background quarrel. The guys in ‘Romeo and Juliet’ are typically depicted as forceful, serious and brutal; then again ladies being the more vulnerable and subordinate sex are overwhelmed by the male. ‘Tis valid; and consequently ladies being the more fragile vessels, are ever pushed to the wall;† From this scene you can see that ladies are being viewed as frail and are not worth the guys time so will be pushed in a bad spot. Ladies are seen as the guys ‘property’ and are relied upon to hear them out beyond a shadow of a doubt. Additionally the guys are the more prevailing sex all through the play. Shakespeare was introducing the play as it seemed to be; the cliché picture of men being tumultuous and ladies who had no privilege or possessed anything. Shakespeare depicted Romeo and Juliet as equivalent rather than the cliché irregularity of fairness of the sixteenth century. Toward the start of the play you can see a dispirited Romeo. He thinks he has experienced passionate feelings for Rosaline when in established truth he hasn’t. â€Å"Why at that point, O fighting adoration! O adoring contempt! † Romeo is portrayed as a ‘typical Petrarchan lover’ where he cherishes Rosaline yet she doesn’t love him back on the grounds that she needed to stay a chaste. Romeo doesn't really cherish Rosaline as when he later meets Juliet he overlooks Rosaline rapidly and shows a progressively enthusiastic love towards Juliet. Shakespeare stresses Romeo’s love by utilizing an interesting expression, which makes an incomprehensible picture in the perusers mind befuddling them and produces another idea or importance. Romeo’s relationship with Juliet was all consuming, instant adoration. Their adoration for one another was energetic as opposed to being constrained like it typically was at that point. â€Å"If I profane with my unworthiest hand This blessed hallowed place, the delicate fine is this†. The social setting at the time implied that affection marriage wasn’t normal anyway Romeo and Juliet promptly begin to look all starry eyed at when they initially meet one another. Juliets love for Romeo is honest as she is unpracticed in the subject of affection, though Romeo falls all through adoration effectively and quickly needs to wed her. Romeo thinks about Juliet to a heavenly holy place and offers his lips as explorers to kiss her. Here, Shakespeare is utilizing strict symbolism to show that their affection for one another is unadulterated and acceptable. He is likewise undercutting the sex jobs, subverting the set up social setting, where the male is prevailing however here Juliet is the more predominant character. The popular overhang scene from ‘Romeo and Juliet’ is one of the most sentimental scenes in the play. â€Å"It is the east and Juliet is the sun! Emerge, reasonable sun, and slaughter the desirous moon†. Here Romeo is contrasting Juliet with a sun; he is stating that she is a brilliant heavenly attendant and more lovely than the moon. Already Juliet was contrasted with a holy place and now to a sun depicting how Romeo feels for Juliet and how what position he has for Juliet in his heart. Besides, Shakespeare is utilizing an analogy to depict that everything spins around Juliet and she is an actual existence power. Once more, Shakespeare is undercutting the sex jobs; he is making Juliet the incredible character. You can see this by the situating of Romeo, on the ground, and Juliet higher up than him, in the overhang, representing she is increasingly predominant. Additional verification of this is Juliet making brave activities, for example, requesting that Romeo wed her. To close the huge thing I notice is the setting during which the play was composed. It was historic in the feeling of how Shakespeare introduced connections and sexual orientation jobs and depicted them so all things considered. It was uncommon for such a play to be discharged with such energetic sentiment. Actually, this play has featured how fortunate we are in the cutting edge society, to have the option to have the opportunity to begin to look all starry eyed at who we need. In any case, the reality remains that this despite everything is an on-going issue in underdeveloped nations where they are holding the convention of masterminded relationships. So this can't come as a stun in light of the fact that sex generalizations despite everything exist in social families, despite the fact that we are uninformed of it living in a created present day society.

Five reasons to ignore your grammar gremlins (for now) - Emphasis

Five motivations to disregard your language beasts (until further notice) Five motivations to disregard your language beasts (until further notice) Heres the uplifting news: if you’re stressed your records are not tantamount to they could be, your language is likely not the issue. Dont misunderstand me. Language matters. Obviously it does. Failing to understand the situation can sabotage your notoriety (however most likely not as much as you might suspect †see beneath). Poor language structure can even totally change the significance of a sentence. In any case, concentrating a lot on it could really be all the more harming. Here are five reasons why you ought to get over your language structure hang-ups. 1. Poor accentuation matters more than grammar. Colons and commas are imperative sign-posts, so it’s essential to place them in the correct spot. What's more, a lost punctuation (or, more terrible, a missing one) will make it seem as though you don’t care. Then again, I’d contend that nobody will get that worked up about whether you end a sentence with a relational word. 2. Language (and accentuation) issues for the most part show further issues. It’s most likely not your blemished comprehension of a lot of arcane sentence structure rules realized distinctly by ace dogmatists that’s keeping down your composition. It’s unmistakably bound to be auxiliary issues or concentrating a lot on your own points as opposed to your readers’. Truth be told, stressing a lot over your sentence structure can really cause further issues. That’s in light of the fact that it genuinely subverts your certainty, making you repay with excessively complex language or sentences. 3. Nearly everybody battles with it. In all honesty, FTSE 100 chiefs and new alumni are frequently joined in vulnerability over certain language structure focuses. Indeed, even experienced editors can spend a lifetime getting the better subtleties. So holding up until you’ve culminated your sentence structure information before you compose anything is counter-beneficial †and purposeless. 4. Impeccable language doesn't consequently mean immaculate archives. Culminating your insight into sentence structure won't consequently make you produce great records, any more than remembering the workshop manual to your sparkly new Ford or Volvo will make you a decent driver. It’s impeccably conceivable to be in fact immaculate yet still produce an invulnerable tome loaded down with bloated professionalese. Concentrate on your readers’ needs, structure your report well and utilize the correct degree of language. At that point you have a generally excellent potential for success of having a genuine effect †indeed, regardless of whether you’ve lost a modifier or left a participle dangling defenselessly. 5. It’s not very late to fill in the holes. In the event that English is your first language, you definitely know 95 percent of the sentence structure you’ll ever need. (What's more, if it’s not, take comfort from the way that your insight into specialized punctuation rules is likely better than that of most local English speakers, just in light of the fact that we get familiar with our first language through use as opposed to contemplating syntax.) Native speakers past the age of four or five definitely know which regular action words are sporadic. They’d never state, for instance, ‘I digged a major opening in the sand’. They realize that ‘dig’ becomes ‘dug’ in the past tense. They just don’t realize that it’s called the past tense. (Nor, at that age, do they have to.) So the undertaking of filling in the holes is truly clear. The chances are that the things you’re uncertain about are similar ones that others battle with. (See point 3, above.) Along these lines, cheer up. Concentrate first on what your peruser has to know, at that point let them know in as clear a route as could be expected under the circumstances. At that point †and at exactly that point †look into any purposes of sentence structure you’re not certain about.

The Mood Disorder Questionnaire

The Mood Disorder Questionnaire Bipolar Disorder Diagnosis Print The Mood Disorder Questionnaire By Marcia Purse Marcia Purse is a mental health writer and bipolar disorder advocate who brings strong research skills and personal experiences to her writing. Learn about our editorial policy Marcia Purse Medically reviewed by Medically reviewed by Steven Gans, MD on August 05, 2016 Steven Gans, MD is board-certified in psychiatry and is an active supervisor, teacher, and mentor at Massachusetts General Hospital. Learn about our Medical Review Board Steven Gans, MD Updated on January 17, 2020 Tom M Johnson/Getty Images More in Bipolar Disorder Diagnosis Symptoms Treatment The Mood Disorder Questionnaire (MDQ) is a screening tool to help doctors better distinguish between depression and bipolar disorder. It was developed by a team of psychiatrists, researchers and consumer advocates led by Robert M.A. Hirschfeld of the University of Texas, Medical Branch. What Does the MDQ Involve? The questionnaire is self-administered and comprised of 5 questions. It asks: if youve experienced any of 13 specific behaviors associated with bipolar disorderif the symptoms you checked in question one occurred at the same timeabout the severity of your symptomsabout your familys history of mental illnessif youve previously been diagnosed with a mental illness You can view the full questionnaire on the Depression and Bipolar Support Alliance website. As per the scoring guidelines, if you answer yes to seven or more of the items in question one, and yes to questions two and three, the screening is considered positive. Is the MDQ Accurate? Early research found the MDQ to have both good sensitivity and specificity. In a 2002 publication, Dr. Hirschfeld reported that the MDQ correctly identified 7 of 10 patients with bipolar disorder, and correctly screened out 9 of 10 patients without bipolar disorder. However, a more recent research report published by Mark Zimmerman et. al. indicates that the results of this questionnaire are more limited than the initial research found. Does This Mean I Have Bipolar Disorder? You shouldnt accept a diagnosis of bipolar disorder based on a brief questionnaire. If your doctor or a therapist uses the MDQ or another similar screening tool, you should simply consider this a starting point towards an accurate diagnosis. Your physician should proceed with a full clinical evaluation for bipolar disorder.

When to Punctuate Titles in Italics or Quotes

You may have wondered in the middle of typing up a research project: Do I italicize  a song title? What about a painting?​ Even the most experienced writers have a problem remembering the proper punctuation for certain types of titles. Books are italicized (or underlined) and articles are put in quotation marks. Thats about as far as many people can remember.​ Many teachers require students to use Modern Language Association style for research papers and essays covering language arts, cultural studies, and the humanities. There is a trick to remembering how to treat titles in MLA style, and it works well enough that you can commit most types of titles to memory. Its the big and little trick. Big Things vs. Little Things Big things and things that can stand on their own, like books, are italicized. Little things that are dependent or that come as part of a group, like chapters, are put into quotation marks. Think of a CD or an album as a major (big) work that can be divided into smaller parts, or songs. The individual song names (small part) are punctuated with quotation marks. For example: The Sweet Escape, by Gwen Stefani, includes the song Wind It Up. While this is not a perfect rule, it can be helpful for determining whether to italicize or surround an item in quotation marks when you have no resources at hand. Furthermore, italicize or underline any published collection, like a book of poetry. Put the individual entry, like a poem, in quotation marks. However: a long, epic poem that is often published on its own would be treated like a book. The Odyssey is one example. Punctuating Titles of Works of Art Creating a work of art is an enormous task. For that reason, you can think of art as a big accomplishment. That might sound a bit corny, but it will help you remember. Individual works of art, like paintings and sculptures, are underlined or italicized: Michelangelos DavidMona LisaThe Last SupperThe Pieta Note that a photograph—although not any less significant or important—is often much smaller than a work of created art, and is placed in quotation marks. Following are guidelines for punctuating titles according to MLA standards. Titles and Names to Italicize Works to put in italics include: A novelA shipA playA filmA paintingA sculpture or statueA drawingA CDA TV SeriesA cartoon seriesAn encyclopediaA magazineA newspaperA pamphlet Titles to Put Into Quotation Marks When deciding how to handle smaller works, put quotation marks around: A poemA short storyA skitA commercialAn individual episode in a TV series (like The Soup Nazi on Seinfeld)A cartoon episode, like Trouble With DogsA chapterAn articleA newspaper story More Tips on Punctuating Titles Some titles are merely capitalized and not given additional punctuation. These include: Religious works, like the Bible or the KoranBuildingsMonuments

Unethical And Criminal Behavior During The Prussian...

The experiment with human subject was brought to an attention to the Prussian Parliament, when several unethical and criminal behaviors were traced in the field of research in Germany in the nineteenth century. The research was mainly conducted unethically in the hospitals, mainly without any informed consent. The turning point for the establishment of universal rule regarding human experiment was done after the case of Neisser, where in 1898, Albert Neisser, who discovered the gonococcus and professor of dermatology at university of Breslau, conducted â€Å"clinical trials on serum therapy in patients with syphilis. In order to find a method of syphilis prevention, he injected cell free serum from patients with syphilis into patients who were admitted for other medical conditions. Most of these patients were prostitutes, who were neither informed about the procedure, nor asked for consent.† After several discussions in the Prussian parliament about the case, attention was giv en to the need of participant’s autonomy and beneficence. The criticism of unethical human experiments in the media and in the parliament, the Reich government issued detailed ‘Guidelines for new therapy and human experimentation’ in 1931 (Vollmann, Rolf, 1996). Nuremberg Code (1946) Since, the post-World War I gave a way for Nazis to rise to power in Germany and that had led to an era, where all basic human rights of the citizens were ceased, the research sector was also greatly affected as ‘the NaziShow MoreRelatedOne Significant Change That Has Occurred in the World Between 1900 and 2005. Explain the Impact This Change Has Made on Our Lives and Why It Is an Important Change.163893 Words   |  656 Pageswhich were spread ever more broadly among different social groups—including women, laborers, INTRODUCTION †¢ 3 ethnic minorities, and gays—made strides that were perhaps greater than all of those achieved in previous history combined. During the same time span, however, state tyranny and brutal oppression reached once unimaginable levels—in large part due to the refinement or introduction of new technologies of repression and surveillance and modes of mass organization and control. Read MoreLogical Reasoning189930 Words   |  760 PagesKirkwood Community College; and Stephanie Tucker, California State University Sacramento. Thinking and writing about logical reasoning has been enjoyable for me, but special thanks go to my children, Joshua, 8, and Justine, 3, for comic relief during the months of writing. This book is dedicated to them. For the 2012 edition: This book is dedicated to my wife Hellan whose good advice has improved the book in many ways. vi Table of Contents Preface....................................

Kaleidoscope Free Essays

Kaleidoscope by Ray Bradbury I am fortunate enough to take a wonderful course that solely focused on Bradbury and his work, taught by his very own biographer. IVe never read as many stories written by a single author before. Even so, I can safely say that he is one of the best writers IVe ever read. We will write a custom essay sample on Kaleidoscope or any similar topic only for you Order Now â€Å"Kaleidoscope,† which appears in Bradburys remarkable short story collection, The Illustrated Man, is a story that literally sends you up into outer space. The name itself gives us an idea what this story is about. The bright colors and hanging views, it is an interesting story but not one that is so funny to read. From the very beginning we know that these men are dead and everything that we are able to do is Just to watch them are dyeing without much hope. This is a kind of deeply philosophical and introspective tale, which is the hallmark of Bradburys writing. Through a simple accident in space, a rocket full of astronauts explodes and its crew is strewn across the emptiness, falling until their oxygen runs out, or until they collide with meteors or the Moon, or the Earth. Kaleidoscope† really is a plot-wise story. It begins after the ship has already exploded. Most of the story takes place from a vantage point close to Hollis. He is the main character and the captain of the ship, a man who has hidden his emotions for most of his life. He went into space because it helped him to avoid women and he clearly envies those men who have better luck with women. He tries to convince himself that there is no difference between him and them but he knows that it isn’t true, they have memories, and he has only dreams. So we can see what he sees as the Earth’s gravity is pulling him in. And soon Hollis is alone, alone with his thought. As these men hurtle toward their fate, feeling helpless in preventing their own deaths, they understandably bicker and find fault with each other. One of the men is the most calm about his death having lived a good life, however there’s a particularly compelling argument between Hollis and Lespere, an apparent womanizer who has actually no regrets, as I have already said, and who lets Hollis know about it. And Hollis retorts that it doesn’t matter, that heyre all meeting the same fate now, and Lespere’s â€Å"life experiences† doesn’t make his life any better than that of Hollis. But, as Lespere explains, â€Å"l got my thoughts, I remember. † On the one hand, a bleakly existentialist view is advanced by Hollis: in the end we all die alone and death renders everything before it pointless. While this may be philosophically sound, though that’s also debatable, it doesnt have the emotional resonance of Lespere’s assertion that one must live as fully as possible, in order to better accept death when the time comes. The fact that Lespere has led a orally reprehensible life, indulging in bigamy and gambling, for starters is Bradbury’s way of cautioning about the extremes of such an attitude. In the end, there is a sense of redemption in Hollis becoming a star upon which a little boy makes a wish. What is really important is that the whole story is telling of the human condition. We as humans, by our nature, become incredibly reflective when we know the end is near. We might even become bitter and spiteful and lash out. Moreover, the question of how people face death is one that is well worth exploring, but in any ypes of tragedy on the Earth, that doesn’t kill people immediately means that they Bradbury gets around exactly that problem by setting â€Å"Kaleidoscope†. The main theme, I believe, is that life is unpredictable and you should enjoy or relish every second of it because you never know when it will be taken from you or someone close to you. The many insignificant squabbles that we constantly encounter in life do not amount to a hill of beans. What is important is love! The beauty of this world is many faceted like a kaleidoscopes image but also very fragile and brief Just like each eparate image in the scope. Some people realize this and live accordingly while others do not until the very end when it is too late. And yet, even with those memories, we’re still the same in those final moments before the end The story seems to take the side of memories, of having done something with one’s life while given the opportunity. Ultimately, â€Å"Kaleidoscope† is the kind of story which provides the opportunity for reflection. It’s the epitome of science-fiction, using hypothetical circumstances to take a deeper look at the human condition. How to cite Kaleidoscope, Papers

Right to Work Laws Essay Example

Right to Work Laws Essay Throughout the years, contested debate over Right-to-Work laws has persisted sparking widespread flare among various groups. Right-to-Work laws give employees the choice of joining a union, but at the same time promote preferring, the practice of enjoying union benefits without paying for them. This paper examines the difference between Right-to-Work and Non-Right-to-Work states, keeping in mind that this Is not a pro-nylon/anta-nylon matter. Although Right-etc)-Work laws appear to point towards economic growth, they are designed to weaken and destroy unions. The main focus of this paper is the major preferring problem, but it also examines the benefits and disadvantages of right-to-work states. More specifically, this paper highlights the conception that Right-to-Work laws are ineffective in the matter that they do not allow a union to function correctly. To start, the background information and foundation of the modern day unions Is Integral. It is undeniable that they set basic worker rights In the rand sasss. However, how unions originated and what they are today Is very different. Onions came from Guilds that date back as early as 300 AD. They were armed as confraternities of workers, sort of something between a trade union, a cartel and a secret society. The ancient guilds existed in India, Asia, Europe, and even Rome. The modern labor unions we hear about today, such as the AAU, originated in the 19th century during the Industrial Revolution. During this period there was a rapid expansion In manufacturing, resulting In unsafe worki ng conditions. Long hours, and low pay. It was not uncommon for people to work 12 to 14 hour shifts on a daily basis. We will write a custom essay sample on Right to Work Laws specifically for you for only $16.38 $13.9/page Order now We will write a custom essay sample on Right to Work Laws specifically for you FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9/page Hire Writer We will write a custom essay sample on Right to Work Laws specifically for you FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9/page Hire Writer In 1914, the Federal Government passed the Clayton Act, which specified, The labor of a human being is not a commodity or article of amerce. This paved the way for modern Unions. It was in this that helped form the unions we are familiar with today (Information Center, 2009). A union is defined as an organized group of employees that form together to participate In collective bargaining with their common employer. Basically, that means that all of the employees get together and demand x from their boss, typically threatening to go on strike if they dont get what they want. There are three steps to forming a union. Step one is to know your rights. Federal and state laws guarantee the right to form unions. It is the right to freedom of speech and freedom of association. Before employees start talking about unionizing, they should get in touch with a union to help them organize. Step two Is finding out which union is right for the situation. Learn about deferent types of unions before placing the right one. Step three Is to get in touch with a union organizer. Organizers assist employees in forming unions on the Job to give them the same opportunity for dignity and respect, good wages and decent working conditions that union members already have (How to, 2010). Once a union is decided on, they can propose the idea of forming a union to the company. The company will usually request a vote. If more than 50% of the employees vote for a union, the union Is formed. (Information Center, 2009) Relations Act (ANAL), through which Congress, for the first time, gav e Organized Labor statutory sanction to get workers fired for refusal to Join a union. A closed shop is what unions and employers called it when employees in a unionized workplace were required to Join the union. In 1947 congress passed the Taft-Hartley Act. This outlawed the closed shop, but permitted something new called union shop. A union shop is a union security clause under which the employer agrees to hire either abort union members or nonmembers but where all non-union employees must become union members within a specified period of time or lose their Jobs. Right-to- work states are open shop. Over the course of the decade, 12 states enacted Right to Work laws. A right-to-work state gives employees the option of whether they want to join a union. In 1947, Congress overrode President Traumas veto to enact revisions to the ANAL, known as the Taft-Hartley Act. Taft-Hartley did not change the Annals forced-unionism provisions, but one clause did formally recognize states prerogative to enact Right to Work laws. This Right to Work clause, Section 14(b), enraged Big Labor (National Institute, 2010). One could endlessly debate unions and the potential benefits and drawbacks to the employees, employers, company and economy. That is not what I am here to do. I want to make it clear that I am not arguing for or against unions, but against Right-to-Work laws. Right-to-work states are currently the biggest debated proposed solution to preventing unions from having too much power, thus becoming inefficient. In all actuality, the current problem with right-to-work laws is that they do not allow a union to operate effectively primarily because of preferring. Preferring is when someone benefits from a union without paying dues or participating. Every union is required too duty of fair representation, a requirement to represent all employees fairly, in good faith, and without discrimination. The duty applies to virtually every action that a union might take in dealing with an employer as the representative of employees. Because of this, in right-to-work states, unions are required to represent all employees whether they are a part of the union or not. Is this fair? The main problem with right-to-work saws is that they do not allow a union to operate wholly simply because all employees are not required to be a part. If a union is operating with the support of only 50% of employees, they are working twice as hard to promote change and improvements with only half the power. Right-to-work laws are portrayed as pro-choice, when in reality they are designed to weaken unions, plain and simple. Right-to-work states have a percentage growth in many areas, while at the same time, Right-to-work states have lower standard of living, less income on average, less benefits, higher poverty rate. Pro-Union activists will tell you these affects, while ignoring the free-riding problem. I am here to uncover the facts behind right-to-work laws. Right-to-work laws are inaccurately portrayed as pro-choice, rather than anti-union and there is undeniable evidence that people earn more in Non-Right-to-work state. Over time, Unions have set working standards for both union and non-union workers. The impact of unions on total nonunion wages is in fact almost as close to the impact on total union wages. Even if one is not part of a union, someone working in a unionized industry is paid 5% more than similar workers in less unionized industries (Michel, 2010). A study by the Economic Policy Institute shows that workers work states. Right-to-work laws claim to give the option of whether you want to Join a union. However, unions cannot operate efficiently when this option is given, because it results in free riders. A free rider is someone who enjoys the benefits off union without paying dues. Under U. S. Law, unions owe a duty of fair representation to all workers they represent, regardless of whether they pay dues. Duty of fair representation is defined as the duty of a trade union to fairly represent employees n the bargaining unit with regard to their rights under the collective agreement (Guide Glossary,2009). With the right-to-work laws, employees dont have to Join a union to receive benefits. This results in less revenue for the union, thus weakening the union. Right-to-work laws are portrayed as a right of choice, when in reality they are contributing to free riders, thus weakening union power. In a non-right-to-work state, employees may be forced to pay union dues as a condition of employment, even if they reject union affiliation Hour Right, 2010). No employee n the United States can be legally required to be a formal union member. In a non- right-to-work state, employees can be forced to pay certain union dues, but never full union dues. People tend to exaggerate limited options in a unionized company. Employees even have the legal right to petition against a union. Majority rules is what forms a union and a union can be abolished in the same way. From a more basic outlook: think off union as a soccer team. Imagine yourself as the coach. You tell your players, congratulations on Joining the team, but guess what, you dont have o participate if you dont want to because this is right-to-work league. Right-to-work laws are essentially doing the same thing. Every argument for right-to-work can be responded with the fact that the purpose of a union is a collaborative effort. There is no reason why unionized and non-unionized companies cannot compete side by side in a competitive market. Ultimately the purpose off union is to collaborate. If every single member of a company are in on something together, they form a union. The sole purpose off union is collective bargaining. Collective bargaining cannot occur when right-to-work laws are in place. So why do right-to-work laws portray themselves as pro-choice? Is it because they want to ignore the fact that they are taking power away from the unions? Ultimately, most right-to-work activists are anti- union. One must remember that the unions of tomorrow are not the same as the unions of yesterday. Unions set national standards for workers rights, and it is a separate debate if unions themselves are still needed today. To conclude the argument against right-to-work laws, unions have set national standards for things such as working conditions, child labor, minimum wage, and benefits. Today, labor Onions continue to affect both unionized and non unionized workers in a positive way. Not only do unions improve workers benefits, they provide a democratic voice for people in the workplace. Unions a. Right-to-work laws are designed to weaken unions, plain and simple. To counter the previous argument, right-to-work laws may or may not weaken unions. It is obvious that right-to-work laws will decrease union membership; however, if employees are given the option of Joining a union, the unions will be forced to work harder to meet the employees needs, thus strengthening the union. Free riding is an undeniable flaw to right-to-work laws. The only pro-right-to-work argument with regards to free-riding would be to say that security with an ultimate outcome of lazy workers. In reality there is more free-riding in an unproductive union than there would be in a right-to-work state. The Bureau of Labor Statistics shows evidence in support of right-to-work states. In recent years employment growth and personal income growth have risen significantly more in right-to-work states opposed to forced-union states. From 2003-2008 alone, the average employment growth rose 9. 1% in right-to-work states opposed to 3. 6% in forced-union states (Region, 2009). This is partly to do with the fact that many Americans move in extraordinary numbers from forced union states to right-to-work states. Population growth from April 2000 to July 2009 is twice as much in right-to- work states as compared to forced union states. Citizens are seeking employment, and right-to-work states is where they find it. The freedom standpoint is also a common argument for right-to-work. A democratic county should be pro-choice. Forced unionism simply does not agree with democratic principles. When employees are given in the option of Joining a union, it forces unions to work harder to meet the Meanys needs as a whole, thus strengthening the union, and the company. Twenty two of the fifty states have adopted right-to-work laws. Oklahoma is the most recent, passing a constitutional amendment in 2001 , but right-to-work becoming first effective in late 2003. Even Debra Lea, senior research analyst for the Oklahoma Department of Commerce admits, we thought it would attract more Jobs, but its hard to measure, (Is Right-To-Work). There are many other factors that can affect a new projects development. The ups and downs of the national and global economy, others business laws a specific state has adopted, among other factors. To conclude, right-to-work laws are designed to destroy unions. In a right to work state employees are given the option of Joining a union, while nothing is done to prevent preferring. U. S. Law requires unions to give a duty of fair representation to all workers. It is arguable that citizens of a democratic country should not be forced to Join a union, but the fact of the matter is, they are not forced, they choose. When one chooses to work for a particular company, he or she chooses to be a part of that union if there is one. A company cannot have half union members and half non-union members, it will not function. Right-to-work laws are designed to destroy unions. I must reinstate that the right-to-work controversy is not an anti-union/pro-union matter. I firmly believe that, in a non right-to-work state, unionized companies can operate alongside of non-union based companies in a competitive market. If employees are given the option of Joining a union, there might as well not be one. Finally, the only solution to the problem of preferring is for right-to-work states not to exist. Even with altered right-to-work laws, unions cannot operate when membership is optional. Imagine a soccer team where membership is optional. How can we succeed as a team if participation is a choice? Imagine if half the team Just stands on the field and does nothing. It is not realistic, it will not work. It is the same for right- to-work states, its either all or nothing. Right-to-work laws are designed to weaken and destroy unions, plain and simple. I suggest that you and your fellow men and women in the workplace vote against right-to-work laws here in Michigan. Right-to- work laws do not exist in our state today, and shall never exist. Again, let me reinstate that this is not a pro-union, anti-union matter. Michigan is a place where did. For one to think that he or she does not have a say in a union is utterly absurd. The beauty of this state is that it gives the employee the option of what kind of company he or she wants to work for. It is not an anti-choice matter. Employees have the choice of being part of a union, and most importantly, employees have a say. When it boils down to it, the reason for failed unions is not the idea of unionism itself, but rather membership activity. Simply, all union members need to be active involved and looks out for not only their personal interest, but the interest of the many. If you as the common citizen vote against right-to-work laws and do these things, the Michigan economy will prosper. Republicans have begun a campaign to make Michigan a right-to-work state. Representatives Robert Selling and Leon Droplet have introduced a two bill legislative package. This bill has been referred to the Commerce Committee and would impact public employees and private sector workers, cutting workers pay and destroying unions. With the Legislature controlled by the Republicans, Governor Jennifer Granola is the only person preventing Michigan from becoming a right-to-work for less state (Union Voice). If you visit unvoiced. Org you can help prevent this change from coming to Michigan. My closing perspective is simply: our states and nations economy is in dire need, but Right-to-work is not the answer. Destroying unions will not solve anything. Get involved with your union if you are in one, and stand up against right-to-work in Michigan. The ongoing debate will continue to persist, but I did try to inform the topic at hand; similarly as my uncle who has experienced this problem firsthand stressed the conflicts of this matter towards me.