How does Shakespeare present the relationship between ‘Romeo and Juliet’ in the early part of the play Essays

How does Shakespeare present the connection among ‘Romeo and Juliet’ in the early piece of the play Essays How does Shakespeare present the connection among ‘Romeo and Juliet’ in the early piece of the play Paper How does Shakespeare present the connection among ‘Romeo and Juliet’ in the early piece of the play Paper Paper Topic: Romeo and Juliet In the sixteenth century a man centric culture, where men ruled ladies, implied that ladies had next to no say in relationships. At the point when Shakespeare previously presented ‘Romeo and Juliet’ just because their sort of relationship was unbelievable and dubious. Organized relationships were normal at the time contingent upon your economic wellbeing and love had no significance. Ladies had no rights and were seen as the ‘property’ of the spouse. Men likewise had no regard for ladies and regularly struck different towns for spouses. At the time wedding at 12 years old gave off an impression of being typical, but at this point is scowled at, yet seeing this from a lacking, social nation would at present have all the earmarks of being ordinary. Shakespeare introduced connections by the manner in which the characters associated, utilizing sensational gadgets and furthermore further upgraded it with the background quarrel. The guys in ‘Romeo and Juliet’ are typically depicted as forceful, serious and brutal; then again ladies being the more vulnerable and subordinate sex are overwhelmed by the male. ‘Tis valid; and consequently ladies being the more fragile vessels, are ever pushed to the wall;† From this scene you can see that ladies are being viewed as frail and are not worth the guys time so will be pushed in a bad spot. Ladies are seen as the guys ‘property’ and are relied upon to hear them out beyond a shadow of a doubt. Additionally the guys are the more prevailing sex all through the play. Shakespeare was introducing the play as it seemed to be; the cliché picture of men being tumultuous and ladies who had no privilege or possessed anything. Shakespeare depicted Romeo and Juliet as equivalent rather than the cliché irregularity of fairness of the sixteenth century. Toward the start of the play you can see a dispirited Romeo. He thinks he has experienced passionate feelings for Rosaline when in established truth he hasn’t. â€Å"Why at that point, O fighting adoration! O adoring contempt! † Romeo is portrayed as a ‘typical Petrarchan lover’ where he cherishes Rosaline yet she doesn’t love him back on the grounds that she needed to stay a chaste. Romeo doesn't really cherish Rosaline as when he later meets Juliet he overlooks Rosaline rapidly and shows a progressively enthusiastic love towards Juliet. Shakespeare stresses Romeo’s love by utilizing an interesting expression, which makes an incomprehensible picture in the perusers mind befuddling them and produces another idea or importance. Romeo’s relationship with Juliet was all consuming, instant adoration. Their adoration for one another was energetic as opposed to being constrained like it typically was at that point. â€Å"If I profane with my unworthiest hand This blessed hallowed place, the delicate fine is this†. The social setting at the time implied that affection marriage wasn’t normal anyway Romeo and Juliet promptly begin to look all starry eyed at when they initially meet one another. Juliets love for Romeo is honest as she is unpracticed in the subject of affection, though Romeo falls all through adoration effectively and quickly needs to wed her. Romeo thinks about Juliet to a heavenly holy place and offers his lips as explorers to kiss her. Here, Shakespeare is utilizing strict symbolism to show that their affection for one another is unadulterated and acceptable. He is likewise undercutting the sex jobs, subverting the set up social setting, where the male is prevailing however here Juliet is the more predominant character. The popular overhang scene from ‘Romeo and Juliet’ is one of the most sentimental scenes in the play. â€Å"It is the east and Juliet is the sun! Emerge, reasonable sun, and slaughter the desirous moon†. Here Romeo is contrasting Juliet with a sun; he is stating that she is a brilliant heavenly attendant and more lovely than the moon. Already Juliet was contrasted with a holy place and now to a sun depicting how Romeo feels for Juliet and how what position he has for Juliet in his heart. Besides, Shakespeare is utilizing an analogy to depict that everything spins around Juliet and she is an actual existence power. Once more, Shakespeare is undercutting the sex jobs; he is making Juliet the incredible character. You can see this by the situating of Romeo, on the ground, and Juliet higher up than him, in the overhang, representing she is increasingly predominant. Additional verification of this is Juliet making brave activities, for example, requesting that Romeo wed her. To close the huge thing I notice is the setting during which the play was composed. It was historic in the feeling of how Shakespeare introduced connections and sexual orientation jobs and depicted them so all things considered. It was uncommon for such a play to be discharged with such energetic sentiment. Actually, this play has featured how fortunate we are in the cutting edge society, to have the option to have the opportunity to begin to look all starry eyed at who we need. In any case, the reality remains that this despite everything is an on-going issue in underdeveloped nations where they are holding the convention of masterminded relationships. So this can't come as a stun in light of the fact that sex generalizations despite everything exist in social families, despite the fact that we are uninformed of it living in a created present day society.

Five reasons to ignore your grammar gremlins (for now) - Emphasis

Five motivations to disregard your language beasts (until further notice) Five motivations to disregard your language beasts (until further notice) Heres the uplifting news: if you’re stressed your records are not tantamount to they could be, your language is likely not the issue. Dont misunderstand me. Language matters. Obviously it does. Failing to understand the situation can sabotage your notoriety (however most likely not as much as you might suspect †see beneath). Poor language structure can even totally change the significance of a sentence. In any case, concentrating a lot on it could really be all the more harming. Here are five reasons why you ought to get over your language structure hang-ups. 1. Poor accentuation matters more than grammar. Colons and commas are imperative sign-posts, so it’s essential to place them in the correct spot. What's more, a lost punctuation (or, more terrible, a missing one) will make it seem as though you don’t care. Then again, I’d contend that nobody will get that worked up about whether you end a sentence with a relational word. 2. Language (and accentuation) issues for the most part show further issues. It’s most likely not your blemished comprehension of a lot of arcane sentence structure rules realized distinctly by ace dogmatists that’s keeping down your composition. It’s unmistakably bound to be auxiliary issues or concentrating a lot on your own points as opposed to your readers’. Truth be told, stressing a lot over your sentence structure can really cause further issues. That’s in light of the fact that it genuinely subverts your certainty, making you repay with excessively complex language or sentences. 3. Nearly everybody battles with it. In all honesty, FTSE 100 chiefs and new alumni are frequently joined in vulnerability over certain language structure focuses. Indeed, even experienced editors can spend a lifetime getting the better subtleties. So holding up until you’ve culminated your sentence structure information before you compose anything is counter-beneficial †and purposeless. 4. Impeccable language doesn't consequently mean immaculate archives. Culminating your insight into sentence structure won't consequently make you produce great records, any more than remembering the workshop manual to your sparkly new Ford or Volvo will make you a decent driver. It’s impeccably conceivable to be in fact immaculate yet still produce an invulnerable tome loaded down with bloated professionalese. Concentrate on your readers’ needs, structure your report well and utilize the correct degree of language. At that point you have a generally excellent potential for success of having a genuine effect †indeed, regardless of whether you’ve lost a modifier or left a participle dangling defenselessly. 5. It’s not very late to fill in the holes. In the event that English is your first language, you definitely know 95 percent of the sentence structure you’ll ever need. (What's more, if it’s not, take comfort from the way that your insight into specialized punctuation rules is likely better than that of most local English speakers, just in light of the fact that we get familiar with our first language through use as opposed to contemplating syntax.) Native speakers past the age of four or five definitely know which regular action words are sporadic. They’d never state, for instance, ‘I digged a major opening in the sand’. They realize that ‘dig’ becomes ‘dug’ in the past tense. They just don’t realize that it’s called the past tense. (Nor, at that age, do they have to.) So the undertaking of filling in the holes is truly clear. The chances are that the things you’re uncertain about are similar ones that others battle with. (See point 3, above.) Along these lines, cheer up. Concentrate first on what your peruser has to know, at that point let them know in as clear a route as could be expected under the circumstances. At that point †and at exactly that point †look into any purposes of sentence structure you’re not certain about.

The Mood Disorder Questionnaire

The Mood Disorder Questionnaire Bipolar Disorder Diagnosis Print The Mood Disorder Questionnaire By Marcia Purse Marcia Purse is a mental health writer and bipolar disorder advocate who brings strong research skills and personal experiences to her writing. Learn about our editorial policy Marcia Purse Medically reviewed by Medically reviewed by Steven Gans, MD on August 05, 2016 Steven Gans, MD is board-certified in psychiatry and is an active supervisor, teacher, and mentor at Massachusetts General Hospital. Learn about our Medical Review Board Steven Gans, MD Updated on January 17, 2020 Tom M Johnson/Getty Images More in Bipolar Disorder Diagnosis Symptoms Treatment The Mood Disorder Questionnaire (MDQ) is a screening tool to help doctors better distinguish between depression and bipolar disorder. It was developed by a team of psychiatrists, researchers and consumer advocates led by Robert M.A. Hirschfeld of the University of Texas, Medical Branch. What Does the MDQ Involve? The questionnaire is self-administered and comprised of 5 questions. It asks: if youve experienced any of 13 specific behaviors associated with bipolar disorderif the symptoms you checked in question one occurred at the same timeabout the severity of your symptomsabout your familys history of mental illnessif youve previously been diagnosed with a mental illness You can view the full questionnaire on the Depression and Bipolar Support Alliance website. As per the scoring guidelines, if you answer yes to seven or more of the items in question one, and yes to questions two and three, the screening is considered positive. Is the MDQ Accurate? Early research found the MDQ to have both good sensitivity and specificity. In a 2002 publication, Dr. Hirschfeld reported that the MDQ correctly identified 7 of 10 patients with bipolar disorder, and correctly screened out 9 of 10 patients without bipolar disorder. However, a more recent research report published by Mark Zimmerman et. al. indicates that the results of this questionnaire are more limited than the initial research found. Does This Mean I Have Bipolar Disorder? You shouldnt accept a diagnosis of bipolar disorder based on a brief questionnaire. If your doctor or a therapist uses the MDQ or another similar screening tool, you should simply consider this a starting point towards an accurate diagnosis. Your physician should proceed with a full clinical evaluation for bipolar disorder.

When to Punctuate Titles in Italics or Quotes

You may have wondered in the middle of typing up a research project: Do I italicize  a song title? What about a painting?​ Even the most experienced writers have a problem remembering the proper punctuation for certain types of titles. Books are italicized (or underlined) and articles are put in quotation marks. Thats about as far as many people can remember.​ Many teachers require students to use Modern Language Association style for research papers and essays covering language arts, cultural studies, and the humanities. There is a trick to remembering how to treat titles in MLA style, and it works well enough that you can commit most types of titles to memory. Its the big and little trick. Big Things vs. Little Things Big things and things that can stand on their own, like books, are italicized. Little things that are dependent or that come as part of a group, like chapters, are put into quotation marks. Think of a CD or an album as a major (big) work that can be divided into smaller parts, or songs. The individual song names (small part) are punctuated with quotation marks. For example: The Sweet Escape, by Gwen Stefani, includes the song Wind It Up. While this is not a perfect rule, it can be helpful for determining whether to italicize or surround an item in quotation marks when you have no resources at hand. Furthermore, italicize or underline any published collection, like a book of poetry. Put the individual entry, like a poem, in quotation marks. However: a long, epic poem that is often published on its own would be treated like a book. The Odyssey is one example. Punctuating Titles of Works of Art Creating a work of art is an enormous task. For that reason, you can think of art as a big accomplishment. That might sound a bit corny, but it will help you remember. Individual works of art, like paintings and sculptures, are underlined or italicized: Michelangelos DavidMona LisaThe Last SupperThe Pieta Note that a photograph—although not any less significant or important—is often much smaller than a work of created art, and is placed in quotation marks. Following are guidelines for punctuating titles according to MLA standards. Titles and Names to Italicize Works to put in italics include: A novelA shipA playA filmA paintingA sculpture or statueA drawingA CDA TV SeriesA cartoon seriesAn encyclopediaA magazineA newspaperA pamphlet Titles to Put Into Quotation Marks When deciding how to handle smaller works, put quotation marks around: A poemA short storyA skitA commercialAn individual episode in a TV series (like The Soup Nazi on Seinfeld)A cartoon episode, like Trouble With DogsA chapterAn articleA newspaper story More Tips on Punctuating Titles Some titles are merely capitalized and not given additional punctuation. These include: Religious works, like the Bible or the KoranBuildingsMonuments

Unethical And Criminal Behavior During The Prussian...

The experiment with human subject was brought to an attention to the Prussian Parliament, when several unethical and criminal behaviors were traced in the field of research in Germany in the nineteenth century. The research was mainly conducted unethically in the hospitals, mainly without any informed consent. The turning point for the establishment of universal rule regarding human experiment was done after the case of Neisser, where in 1898, Albert Neisser, who discovered the gonococcus and professor of dermatology at university of Breslau, conducted â€Å"clinical trials on serum therapy in patients with syphilis. In order to find a method of syphilis prevention, he injected cell free serum from patients with syphilis into patients who were admitted for other medical conditions. Most of these patients were prostitutes, who were neither informed about the procedure, nor asked for consent.† After several discussions in the Prussian parliament about the case, attention was giv en to the need of participant’s autonomy and beneficence. The criticism of unethical human experiments in the media and in the parliament, the Reich government issued detailed ‘Guidelines for new therapy and human experimentation’ in 1931 (Vollmann, Rolf, 1996). Nuremberg Code (1946) Since, the post-World War I gave a way for Nazis to rise to power in Germany and that had led to an era, where all basic human rights of the citizens were ceased, the research sector was also greatly affected as ‘the NaziShow MoreRelatedOne Significant Change That Has Occurred in the World Between 1900 and 2005. Explain the Impact This Change Has Made on Our Lives and Why It Is an Important Change.163893 Words   |  656 Pageswhich were spread ever more broadly among different social groups—including women, laborers, INTRODUCTION †¢ 3 ethnic minorities, and gays—made strides that were perhaps greater than all of those achieved in previous history combined. During the same time span, however, state tyranny and brutal oppression reached once unimaginable levels—in large part due to the refinement or introduction of new technologies of repression and surveillance and modes of mass organization and control. Read MoreLogical Reasoning189930 Words   |  760 PagesKirkwood Community College; and Stephanie Tucker, California State University Sacramento. Thinking and writing about logical reasoning has been enjoyable for me, but special thanks go to my children, Joshua, 8, and Justine, 3, for comic relief during the months of writing. This book is dedicated to them. For the 2012 edition: This book is dedicated to my wife Hellan whose good advice has improved the book in many ways. vi Table of Contents Preface....................................

Kaleidoscope Free Essays

Kaleidoscope by Ray Bradbury I am fortunate enough to take a wonderful course that solely focused on Bradbury and his work, taught by his very own biographer. IVe never read as many stories written by a single author before. Even so, I can safely say that he is one of the best writers IVe ever read. We will write a custom essay sample on Kaleidoscope or any similar topic only for you Order Now â€Å"Kaleidoscope,† which appears in Bradburys remarkable short story collection, The Illustrated Man, is a story that literally sends you up into outer space. The name itself gives us an idea what this story is about. The bright colors and hanging views, it is an interesting story but not one that is so funny to read. From the very beginning we know that these men are dead and everything that we are able to do is Just to watch them are dyeing without much hope. This is a kind of deeply philosophical and introspective tale, which is the hallmark of Bradburys writing. Through a simple accident in space, a rocket full of astronauts explodes and its crew is strewn across the emptiness, falling until their oxygen runs out, or until they collide with meteors or the Moon, or the Earth. Kaleidoscope† really is a plot-wise story. It begins after the ship has already exploded. Most of the story takes place from a vantage point close to Hollis. He is the main character and the captain of the ship, a man who has hidden his emotions for most of his life. He went into space because it helped him to avoid women and he clearly envies those men who have better luck with women. He tries to convince himself that there is no difference between him and them but he knows that it isn’t true, they have memories, and he has only dreams. So we can see what he sees as the Earth’s gravity is pulling him in. And soon Hollis is alone, alone with his thought. As these men hurtle toward their fate, feeling helpless in preventing their own deaths, they understandably bicker and find fault with each other. One of the men is the most calm about his death having lived a good life, however there’s a particularly compelling argument between Hollis and Lespere, an apparent womanizer who has actually no regrets, as I have already said, and who lets Hollis know about it. And Hollis retorts that it doesn’t matter, that heyre all meeting the same fate now, and Lespere’s â€Å"life experiences† doesn’t make his life any better than that of Hollis. But, as Lespere explains, â€Å"l got my thoughts, I remember. † On the one hand, a bleakly existentialist view is advanced by Hollis: in the end we all die alone and death renders everything before it pointless. While this may be philosophically sound, though that’s also debatable, it doesnt have the emotional resonance of Lespere’s assertion that one must live as fully as possible, in order to better accept death when the time comes. The fact that Lespere has led a orally reprehensible life, indulging in bigamy and gambling, for starters is Bradbury’s way of cautioning about the extremes of such an attitude. In the end, there is a sense of redemption in Hollis becoming a star upon which a little boy makes a wish. What is really important is that the whole story is telling of the human condition. We as humans, by our nature, become incredibly reflective when we know the end is near. We might even become bitter and spiteful and lash out. Moreover, the question of how people face death is one that is well worth exploring, but in any ypes of tragedy on the Earth, that doesn’t kill people immediately means that they Bradbury gets around exactly that problem by setting â€Å"Kaleidoscope†. The main theme, I believe, is that life is unpredictable and you should enjoy or relish every second of it because you never know when it will be taken from you or someone close to you. The many insignificant squabbles that we constantly encounter in life do not amount to a hill of beans. What is important is love! The beauty of this world is many faceted like a kaleidoscopes image but also very fragile and brief Just like each eparate image in the scope. Some people realize this and live accordingly while others do not until the very end when it is too late. And yet, even with those memories, we’re still the same in those final moments before the end The story seems to take the side of memories, of having done something with one’s life while given the opportunity. Ultimately, â€Å"Kaleidoscope† is the kind of story which provides the opportunity for reflection. It’s the epitome of science-fiction, using hypothetical circumstances to take a deeper look at the human condition. How to cite Kaleidoscope, Papers

Right to Work Laws Essay Example

Right to Work Laws Essay Throughout the years, contested debate over Right-to-Work laws has persisted sparking widespread flare among various groups. Right-to-Work laws give employees the choice of joining a union, but at the same time promote preferring, the practice of enjoying union benefits without paying for them. This paper examines the difference between Right-to-Work and Non-Right-to-Work states, keeping in mind that this Is not a pro-nylon/anta-nylon matter. Although Right-etc)-Work laws appear to point towards economic growth, they are designed to weaken and destroy unions. The main focus of this paper is the major preferring problem, but it also examines the benefits and disadvantages of right-to-work states. More specifically, this paper highlights the conception that Right-to-Work laws are ineffective in the matter that they do not allow a union to function correctly. To start, the background information and foundation of the modern day unions Is Integral. It is undeniable that they set basic worker rights In the rand sasss. However, how unions originated and what they are today Is very different. Onions came from Guilds that date back as early as 300 AD. They were armed as confraternities of workers, sort of something between a trade union, a cartel and a secret society. The ancient guilds existed in India, Asia, Europe, and even Rome. The modern labor unions we hear about today, such as the AAU, originated in the 19th century during the Industrial Revolution. During this period there was a rapid expansion In manufacturing, resulting In unsafe worki ng conditions. Long hours, and low pay. It was not uncommon for people to work 12 to 14 hour shifts on a daily basis. We will write a custom essay sample on Right to Work Laws specifically for you for only $16.38 $13.9/page Order now We will write a custom essay sample on Right to Work Laws specifically for you FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9/page Hire Writer We will write a custom essay sample on Right to Work Laws specifically for you FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9/page Hire Writer In 1914, the Federal Government passed the Clayton Act, which specified, The labor of a human being is not a commodity or article of amerce. This paved the way for modern Unions. It was in this that helped form the unions we are familiar with today (Information Center, 2009). A union is defined as an organized group of employees that form together to participate In collective bargaining with their common employer. Basically, that means that all of the employees get together and demand x from their boss, typically threatening to go on strike if they dont get what they want. There are three steps to forming a union. Step one is to know your rights. Federal and state laws guarantee the right to form unions. It is the right to freedom of speech and freedom of association. Before employees start talking about unionizing, they should get in touch with a union to help them organize. Step two Is finding out which union is right for the situation. Learn about deferent types of unions before placing the right one. Step three Is to get in touch with a union organizer. Organizers assist employees in forming unions on the Job to give them the same opportunity for dignity and respect, good wages and decent working conditions that union members already have (How to, 2010). Once a union is decided on, they can propose the idea of forming a union to the company. The company will usually request a vote. If more than 50% of the employees vote for a union, the union Is formed. (Information Center, 2009) Relations Act (ANAL), through which Congress, for the first time, gav e Organized Labor statutory sanction to get workers fired for refusal to Join a union. A closed shop is what unions and employers called it when employees in a unionized workplace were required to Join the union. In 1947 congress passed the Taft-Hartley Act. This outlawed the closed shop, but permitted something new called union shop. A union shop is a union security clause under which the employer agrees to hire either abort union members or nonmembers but where all non-union employees must become union members within a specified period of time or lose their Jobs. Right-to- work states are open shop. Over the course of the decade, 12 states enacted Right to Work laws. A right-to-work state gives employees the option of whether they want to join a union. In 1947, Congress overrode President Traumas veto to enact revisions to the ANAL, known as the Taft-Hartley Act. Taft-Hartley did not change the Annals forced-unionism provisions, but one clause did formally recognize states prerogative to enact Right to Work laws. This Right to Work clause, Section 14(b), enraged Big Labor (National Institute, 2010). One could endlessly debate unions and the potential benefits and drawbacks to the employees, employers, company and economy. That is not what I am here to do. I want to make it clear that I am not arguing for or against unions, but against Right-to-Work laws. Right-to-work states are currently the biggest debated proposed solution to preventing unions from having too much power, thus becoming inefficient. In all actuality, the current problem with right-to-work laws is that they do not allow a union to operate effectively primarily because of preferring. Preferring is when someone benefits from a union without paying dues or participating. Every union is required too duty of fair representation, a requirement to represent all employees fairly, in good faith, and without discrimination. The duty applies to virtually every action that a union might take in dealing with an employer as the representative of employees. Because of this, in right-to-work states, unions are required to represent all employees whether they are a part of the union or not. Is this fair? The main problem with right-to-work saws is that they do not allow a union to operate wholly simply because all employees are not required to be a part. If a union is operating with the support of only 50% of employees, they are working twice as hard to promote change and improvements with only half the power. Right-to-work laws are portrayed as pro-choice, when in reality they are designed to weaken unions, plain and simple. Right-to-work states have a percentage growth in many areas, while at the same time, Right-to-work states have lower standard of living, less income on average, less benefits, higher poverty rate. Pro-Union activists will tell you these affects, while ignoring the free-riding problem. I am here to uncover the facts behind right-to-work laws. Right-to-work laws are inaccurately portrayed as pro-choice, rather than anti-union and there is undeniable evidence that people earn more in Non-Right-to-work state. Over time, Unions have set working standards for both union and non-union workers. The impact of unions on total nonunion wages is in fact almost as close to the impact on total union wages. Even if one is not part of a union, someone working in a unionized industry is paid 5% more than similar workers in less unionized industries (Michel, 2010). A study by the Economic Policy Institute shows that workers work states. Right-to-work laws claim to give the option of whether you want to Join a union. However, unions cannot operate efficiently when this option is given, because it results in free riders. A free rider is someone who enjoys the benefits off union without paying dues. Under U. S. Law, unions owe a duty of fair representation to all workers they represent, regardless of whether they pay dues. Duty of fair representation is defined as the duty of a trade union to fairly represent employees n the bargaining unit with regard to their rights under the collective agreement (Guide Glossary,2009). With the right-to-work laws, employees dont have to Join a union to receive benefits. This results in less revenue for the union, thus weakening the union. Right-to-work laws are portrayed as a right of choice, when in reality they are contributing to free riders, thus weakening union power. In a non-right-to-work state, employees may be forced to pay union dues as a condition of employment, even if they reject union affiliation Hour Right, 2010). No employee n the United States can be legally required to be a formal union member. In a non- right-to-work state, employees can be forced to pay certain union dues, but never full union dues. People tend to exaggerate limited options in a unionized company. Employees even have the legal right to petition against a union. Majority rules is what forms a union and a union can be abolished in the same way. From a more basic outlook: think off union as a soccer team. Imagine yourself as the coach. You tell your players, congratulations on Joining the team, but guess what, you dont have o participate if you dont want to because this is right-to-work league. Right-to-work laws are essentially doing the same thing. Every argument for right-to-work can be responded with the fact that the purpose of a union is a collaborative effort. There is no reason why unionized and non-unionized companies cannot compete side by side in a competitive market. Ultimately the purpose off union is to collaborate. If every single member of a company are in on something together, they form a union. The sole purpose off union is collective bargaining. Collective bargaining cannot occur when right-to-work laws are in place. So why do right-to-work laws portray themselves as pro-choice? Is it because they want to ignore the fact that they are taking power away from the unions? Ultimately, most right-to-work activists are anti- union. One must remember that the unions of tomorrow are not the same as the unions of yesterday. Unions set national standards for workers rights, and it is a separate debate if unions themselves are still needed today. To conclude the argument against right-to-work laws, unions have set national standards for things such as working conditions, child labor, minimum wage, and benefits. Today, labor Onions continue to affect both unionized and non unionized workers in a positive way. Not only do unions improve workers benefits, they provide a democratic voice for people in the workplace. Unions a. Right-to-work laws are designed to weaken unions, plain and simple. To counter the previous argument, right-to-work laws may or may not weaken unions. It is obvious that right-to-work laws will decrease union membership; however, if employees are given the option of Joining a union, the unions will be forced to work harder to meet the employees needs, thus strengthening the union. Free riding is an undeniable flaw to right-to-work laws. The only pro-right-to-work argument with regards to free-riding would be to say that security with an ultimate outcome of lazy workers. In reality there is more free-riding in an unproductive union than there would be in a right-to-work state. The Bureau of Labor Statistics shows evidence in support of right-to-work states. In recent years employment growth and personal income growth have risen significantly more in right-to-work states opposed to forced-union states. From 2003-2008 alone, the average employment growth rose 9. 1% in right-to-work states opposed to 3. 6% in forced-union states (Region, 2009). This is partly to do with the fact that many Americans move in extraordinary numbers from forced union states to right-to-work states. Population growth from April 2000 to July 2009 is twice as much in right-to- work states as compared to forced union states. Citizens are seeking employment, and right-to-work states is where they find it. The freedom standpoint is also a common argument for right-to-work. A democratic county should be pro-choice. Forced unionism simply does not agree with democratic principles. When employees are given in the option of Joining a union, it forces unions to work harder to meet the Meanys needs as a whole, thus strengthening the union, and the company. Twenty two of the fifty states have adopted right-to-work laws. Oklahoma is the most recent, passing a constitutional amendment in 2001 , but right-to-work becoming first effective in late 2003. Even Debra Lea, senior research analyst for the Oklahoma Department of Commerce admits, we thought it would attract more Jobs, but its hard to measure, (Is Right-To-Work). There are many other factors that can affect a new projects development. The ups and downs of the national and global economy, others business laws a specific state has adopted, among other factors. To conclude, right-to-work laws are designed to destroy unions. In a right to work state employees are given the option of Joining a union, while nothing is done to prevent preferring. U. S. Law requires unions to give a duty of fair representation to all workers. It is arguable that citizens of a democratic country should not be forced to Join a union, but the fact of the matter is, they are not forced, they choose. When one chooses to work for a particular company, he or she chooses to be a part of that union if there is one. A company cannot have half union members and half non-union members, it will not function. Right-to-work laws are designed to destroy unions. I must reinstate that the right-to-work controversy is not an anti-union/pro-union matter. I firmly believe that, in a non right-to-work state, unionized companies can operate alongside of non-union based companies in a competitive market. If employees are given the option of Joining a union, there might as well not be one. Finally, the only solution to the problem of preferring is for right-to-work states not to exist. Even with altered right-to-work laws, unions cannot operate when membership is optional. Imagine a soccer team where membership is optional. How can we succeed as a team if participation is a choice? Imagine if half the team Just stands on the field and does nothing. It is not realistic, it will not work. It is the same for right- to-work states, its either all or nothing. Right-to-work laws are designed to weaken and destroy unions, plain and simple. I suggest that you and your fellow men and women in the workplace vote against right-to-work laws here in Michigan. Right-to- work laws do not exist in our state today, and shall never exist. Again, let me reinstate that this is not a pro-union, anti-union matter. Michigan is a place where did. For one to think that he or she does not have a say in a union is utterly absurd. The beauty of this state is that it gives the employee the option of what kind of company he or she wants to work for. It is not an anti-choice matter. Employees have the choice of being part of a union, and most importantly, employees have a say. When it boils down to it, the reason for failed unions is not the idea of unionism itself, but rather membership activity. Simply, all union members need to be active involved and looks out for not only their personal interest, but the interest of the many. If you as the common citizen vote against right-to-work laws and do these things, the Michigan economy will prosper. Republicans have begun a campaign to make Michigan a right-to-work state. Representatives Robert Selling and Leon Droplet have introduced a two bill legislative package. This bill has been referred to the Commerce Committee and would impact public employees and private sector workers, cutting workers pay and destroying unions. With the Legislature controlled by the Republicans, Governor Jennifer Granola is the only person preventing Michigan from becoming a right-to-work for less state (Union Voice). If you visit unvoiced. Org you can help prevent this change from coming to Michigan. My closing perspective is simply: our states and nations economy is in dire need, but Right-to-work is not the answer. Destroying unions will not solve anything. Get involved with your union if you are in one, and stand up against right-to-work in Michigan. The ongoing debate will continue to persist, but I did try to inform the topic at hand; similarly as my uncle who has experienced this problem firsthand stressed the conflicts of this matter towards me.

Military and Staff Sargent Giunta Essay

Military and Staff Sargent Giunta Essay Military and Staff Sargent Giunta Essay Honor, Duty and Respect There are very few men who are awarded the Medal of Honor; more than that however are still alive to tell their story. Staff Sargent Giunta displayed actions of honor, duty, and respect on several occasions during the night of the attack on himself and his fellow soldiers. He presented honor to his superior’s by doing what he had been trained to do in the situation. His duty was to protect his comrades and without hesitation and he did so. Staff Sargent Giunta showed respect because he said that all of the other Medal of Honor recipients before him were all actual heroes. He specifically said that he wasn’t doing anything that one of his other buddies wouldn’t have done. Honor. As a very patriotic American citizen honor means a lot to me because if the public doesn’t have honor towards its country then the country means nothing. After listing and reading about Staff Sargent Giunta his honor towards his country was exactly what the military of the United States should want out of a soldier in my eyes. He humbled himself to save a comrade and then didn’t expect anything in return. Honor is what other people did before you that created a higher standard of living. Having honor as one of your personal characteristics is living day to day with those higher standards because you believe in the men and women that came before you. Duty is an act of service in the military or living life by a moral code. I believe that a soldier’s duty is instilled inside of them throughout their years of service. Staff Sargent and the men that fought next to him knew their duty as soldiers. You could tell this because it didn’t take long for the men to register what was going on the men immediately got into position and returned fire. From the videos and reading material about Staff Sargent Giunta actions there is no way

How to Write Natural Dialogue for Narratives

How to Write Natural Dialogue for Narratives Writing verbal conversations or dialogue is often one of the trickiest parts of creative writing. Crafting effective dialogue within the context of a narrative requires much more than following one quote with another. With practice, though, you can learn how to write natural-sounding dialogue that is creative and compelling. The Purpose of Dialogue Put simply, dialogue is narrative conveyed through speech by two or more characters. Effective dialogue should do many things at once, not simply convey information. It should set the scene, advance action, give insight into each character, and foreshadow future dramatic action. Dialogue doesnt have to be grammatically correct; it should read like actual speech. However, there must be a balance between realistic speech and readability. Dialogue is also a tool for character development. Word choice tells a reader a lot about a person: their appearance, ethnicity, sexuality, background, even morality. It can also tell the reader how the writer feels about a certain character. How to Write Direct Dialogue Speech, also known as direct dialogue, can be an effective means of conveying information quickly. But most real-life conversations are boring to read. An exchange between two friends may go something like this: Hi, Tony, said Katy. Hey, Tony answered. Whats wrong? Katy asked. Nothing, Tony said. Really? Youre not acting like nothings wrong. Pretty tiresome dialogue, right? By including nonverbal details in your dialogue, you can articulate emotion through action. This adds dramatic tension and is more engaging to read. Consider this revision: Hi, Tony. Tony looked down at his shoe, dug in his toe and pushed around a pile of dust. Hey, he replied. Katy could tell something was wrong. Sometimes saying nothing or saying the opposite of what we know a character  feels is the best way to create dramatic tension. If a character wants to say I love you, but his actions or words say I dont care, the reader will cringe at the missed opportunity. How to Write Indirect Dialogue Indirect dialogue doesnt rely on speech. Instead, it uses thoughts, memories, or recollections of past conversations to reveal important narrative details. Often, a writer will combine direct and indirect dialogue to increase dramatic tension, as in this example: Hi, Tony. Tony looked down at his shoe, dug in his toe and pushed around a pile of dust. Hey, he replied. Katy braced herself. Something was wrong. Formatting and Style To write dialogue that is effective, you must also pay attention to formatting and style. Correct use of tags, punctuation, and paragraphs can be as important as the words themselves. Remember that punctuation goes inside quotations. This keeps the dialogue clear and separate from the rest of the narrative. For example: I cant believe you just did that! Start a new paragraph each time the speaker changes. If there is action involved with a speaking character, keep the description of the action within the same paragraph as the characters dialogue. Dialogue tags other than said are best used sparingly, if at all. Often a writer uses them to try to convey a certain emotion. For example: But I dont want to go to sleep yet, he whined. Instead of telling the reader that the boy whined, a good writer will describe the scene in a way that conjures the image of a whining little boy: He stood in the doorway with his hands balled into little fists at his sides. His red, tear-rimmed eyes glared up at his mother. But I dont want to go to sleep yet. Practice Makes Perfect Writing dialogue is like any other skill. It requires constant practice if you want to improve as a writer. Here are a few tips to help you tune your ear. Start a dialogue diary. Practice speech patterns and vocabulary that may be foreign to you. This will give you the opportunity to really get to know your characters.Eavesdrop. Carry a small notebook with you and write down phrases, words, or whole conversations verbatim to help develop your ear.Read. Reading will hone your creative abilities. It will help familiarize you with the form and flow of narration and dialogue until it becomes more natural in your own writing.

Ecology Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words

Ecology - Essay Example Global warming is however beginning to have significant impact on this insect. This impact may as yet not be dramatic for decades but a clue of what is in the offing, if unchecked, is already visible in the study of this insect. A major contributing factor to the issue of global warming is the dependence of industrial sectors on fossil fuels which are rich in carbon and when burned combines with oxygen to produce carbon dioxide. The Sinai Baton Blue butterfly is found in the terrestrial ecosystems around the globe. Unfortunately global warming is having a very harmful effect on the Natural habitat of this butterfly. This butterfly must maintain a level of interaction with its abiotic environment in order to survive. Proteins and nucleic acids are essential nutrients to this insect and the growth of plants from which it derives these nutrients is being severely hampered by the reduction in nitrogen in the soil. Nitrogen fixation by decomposers is already being affected by global warming. Also affected in its terrestrial ecosystems is the water cycle, over 90 Percent of the moisture that enters the ecosystem passes through plants and evaporates from their leaves. A reduction In soil nitrogen therefore affects the water cycle. The earths rising temperature are beginning very noticeable impact on this butterfly. Its ecosystems are changing on the individual, population and community levels. At the individual level of its ecology this butterfly may not survive in a region above certain degrees in termperature.the change being witnessed now is an estimated average of 0.6C within the last 100 years. It therefore implies that with the current rate in global warming more drastic changes will occur that will lead to the outright extinction of this butterfly. The Sinai Baton blues are beginning to breed and migrate earlier than expected. They have shifted ranges northward by 200km in Europe and north America-a pole ward shift and as well movement towards higher elevations. In the next 50 years the Sinai Baton Blue Butterfly will have migrated to areas, which were uninhabitable to it in the past. Another area where the potential effect of global warming will be felt greatly are the categories of plant it helps pollinate. Plants are among the slow movers in reaction to changes in global warming. a direct implication therefore will be extinction of large numbers of plant species. As more and more of this butterflies jostle for the available conducive habitat, a trend will set in-the survival of the fittest. This happens because the population will continue to rise without limit thus ensuing gross overcrowding and the habitat becomes saturated with the butterflies as it reaches its full carrying capacity and can support no more, thus leading to invariable reduction in population. Global warming also has the potential to decrease the diversity of the butterfly, which occurs when their habitat is drastically altered. Interactions among these butterflies and other species also result. In conclusion the current rate of global warming is very disturbing. Severe stress and pressure is being mounted on the butterfly and there is an urgent need to quickly find ways of reducing the harmful impact of the

The US Presidential Electoral System Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words

The US Presidential Electoral System - Essay Example After the election, the delegates cast their electoral vote and the winner is decided. This system was necessitated at the birth of the nation when counting a national popular vote was impractical. In addition, it protected the government offices from being decided by an ill-informed electorate. Though it is generally an adequate reflection of the voters' preference, it has several weaknesses. One weakness in the electoral college, that a popular vote system would rectify, is the unequal distribution of voter power. Under the current system, the number of electoral votes is equal to the number of House members plus two. Since the number of House members is based on population, this gives an advantage to the smaller states (Bennett 3). Voters in the least populated states have more power with their individual votes than the voters in the larger states do. In addition, since the apportionment of electoral votes is based on the census, it is always out of date, sometimes by as much as 1 0 years (Edwards 2). A popular vote system would alleviate both of these problems and accurately reflect the population on an equal basis. Individual voter power is further hampered when the minority (loser) in the large states are awarded no electoral delegates at all. Leib and Mark state that, "Minority voters in large non-swing states—say Republicans today in California or New York, as well as Democrats in Texas—have the most reason to be upset with the current method of awarding electoral votes" (106). Uneven apportionment, out of date census data, and no minority voice creates an unjust system of voter unfairness. One of the purposes of an electoral system is to facilitate and encourage voter participation. When voters feel like their vote is of little or no value, they will be discouraged from participating in the process. As an example, Indiana has traditionally voted overwhelmingly for the Republican presidential candidate in the last several elections. Though Democrats make up as much as 40 percent of the vote, their votes have not been counted for years. For all practical purposes, they have no reason to vote for a candidate that can not carry the state. "These disincentives essentially take the form of reducing the perceived benefits of voting for a Presidential candidate by restricting the power of votes to state jurisdictions rather than allowing all votes equal value (power) in a national election determined strictly by a popular vote" (Cebula and Murphy 188). Reforming the electoral college to reflect a more equitable system of voter power would encourage greater voter participation. Moving to a popular vote system would not only more fairly represent the voters, it would also reduce the special favor spending projects that are awarded

Oedipus the King and Mason’s Shiloh Essay -- comparison compare contra

Oedipus the King and Mason’s Shiloh  Ã‚     Ã‚   "Shiloh," written by Bobbie Ann Mason, and Oedipus the King, written by Sophocles, contain extremely different story lines but jointly have one unique quality, the role of the woman. In each of these stories, the females struggle to overcome one major obstacle plaguing them by using their inner-strength. Norma Jean from "Shiloh" fights to leave a seemingly endless marriage, and Jocasta from Oedipus the King struggles against an ill-fate. Norma Jean and Jocasta believe that they are strong enough to conquer these challenges, but, in the end, they both realize they are not strong enough and commit suicide because of this defeat. Norma Jean and Jocasta strive to beat the one main obstacle placed before each of them; Norma Jean fights against marriage, and Jocasta struggles against fate. In "Shiloh," Norma Jean is married to a man with which she cannot live anymore. By strengthening herself mentally and physically, Norma Jean believes that she can leave her husband, Leroy. In preparation for the day when Norma Jean will leave Leroy, she takes a body-building and English composition class. After working out one day Norma Jean explains to Leroy, "I'd give anything if I could just get these muscles to where they're real hard" (491). Strengthening the mind and body is the only way Norma Jean knows to build her self-esteem and prepare herself for this day that will soon be upon her. On the other hand, Jocasta has always been a mentally strong woman. Jocasta's battle is against something much more severe than a bad marriage; she battles fate. When Jocasta first had her baby, Oedipus, an oracle declared to Jocasta th at "doom would strike him[Laius] down at the hands of a son, / our son, to... ...r too overwhelming for her. Once again the woman was not strong enough to overcome life's many challenges. How does one know if he or she has enough strength? In both of these stories, the women try to battle life using inner-strength. Even though Norma Jean and Jocasta are under extremely different circumstances, both make the same ultimate decision, death. Whether or not death was the right choice, this choice was made by both characters. Their strength was not enough to surpass the problems of life. Works Cited Mason, Bobbie Ann. "Shiloh." Literature: An Introduction to Fiction, Poetry, and Drama. Sixth edition. Eds. X.J. Kennedy and Dana Gioia. New York: Harper Collins, 1995. Sophocles. Oedipus the King. Discovering Literature: Fiction, Poetry, and Drama. Eds. Hans P. Guth and Gabriele L. Rico. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1993.      

What can you learn about Roosevelt from this Source?

What can you learn about Roosevelt from this Source? Explain your answer, using details from the source. (6 marks) One thing that I think you can learn from source A about Roosevelt is that he was clearly a kind and caring man. Although Source A has been taken out of context it is clear that the writer of this letter thought that Roosevelt was a very fine president. From source A we can assume that the writer of this letter was having difficulties and was having trouble extending his mortgage so he wrote to the president asking for help. We can then assume that the President sent a letter in reply saying that he will send one of his workers or acquaintances to try and help the man/ woman get their house/furniture back for them. This shows that Roosevelt was very considerate and did not set himself back from the ordinary people of America. With acts like these, he inspired the American people and gave them courage throughout the Depression and Second World War. Though there are many things that can be learnt from source A about Franklin D. Roosevelt, there are still important things that cannot be learnt. We cannot learn whether the writer of this letter previously knew the President or find out who he or she was. Another important thing that we cannot find out from source A is the precise facts of what went on, i.e. was the house gong to be repossessed? Or what were his or her financial details? Without this information, it is hard to find out whether Roosevelt would have been as generous to everyone as he was to this person. Question 2 – Study sources B and C How far do these two sources differ in their view of Roosevelt as president? Explain your answer-using details from the sources and your own knowledge. (7 marks) Sources B and C differ in many ways. For example, one is anti-Roosevelt, and one is pro-Roosevelt. The cartoons were both drawn in the mid-1930's but source C clearly attacks Roosevelt while source B is optimistic and shows that Roosevelt is trying to remove the bad and clean America up. These sources are both cartoons that are opposite and show the views that were circulating at that time. Source B shows that the treasurer is counting the cost of this clean up and shows that FDR is ready for work as his sleeves are rolled up, and portrays him as a very dedicated president. The cartoon for source B shows FDR carrying out his promises, one of these were to take ‘action and action now!' Roosevelt worked alongside the Brain Trust, which was a group of experts, which passed new laws; one of these was called ‘The New Deal'. America's economy was in such a state that Roosevelt was given emergency powers and with these he carried out his three aims which were: Relief, Recovery, and Reform. Roosevelt was prepared to provide a large amount of Government money to relieve the poor but to raise Government money taxes had to be raised and this, along with many other factors, is why the rich did not like FDR. In the mid-1930's the newspapers were not in support of FDR, neither were businessmen and the Republicans, this was because they thought for one, that the New Deal would be making people lazy, and certain people would just depend on Government help and handouts. They also did not like the New Deal, as it was the well off that had to pay for the Social Security of their workers. Source C differs from source B completely, as source C shows the taxpayer's money is being completely wasted and that all of the money that is getting put into the New Deal is not giving a just return. It shows that the actual New Deal has flaws in it that make the New Deal dysfunctional, whereas source B is pro-Roosevelt and shows that he is cleaning up the mess that President Hoover left America in. Source B shows that FDR is getting rid of all of the promises and things that Hoover was unable to carry out and things that were associated with Hoover. Source C and Source B can be seen as the rich and the poor people's views at this time of American history. Source C as the rich and Source B as the poor and those affected by the Great Depression. Source B shows that FDR is clearing the old (bad) and making way for the new (good). He is giving moral to the citizens by showing them how to forget the past and to focus on the future. The sources differ, and another way of explaining this is the way in which source B states the year that the cartoon was drawn and says who it was by, whereas source C shown the cartoon and assumes that it was drawn in the mid 1930's but does not say who by. Question 3 – Study sources D and E Which source is more reliable on the popularity of Roosevelt as president? Explain your answer, using details from the source and your own knowledge. (8 marks) The source that I think is more reliable on the popularity of Roosevelt as president is source E, I think for the following reasons. Source D is written by Roosevelt himself and shows his view on the previous government and what they did not do. He says and acknowledges that the previous government was dysfunctional and says that America had to go through nine years of allusions that Hoover and his government put forth. Roosevelt says that ‘powerful influences' (businessmen, rich and Republicans) are still trying to bring back the old government that ‘failed' and did not care for the ordinary people of America. This is probably because they did not have to pay as much money for Tax and did not have to pay for the Social Security of their workers. FDR states that government by organised money, i.e. rich businessmen, is as dangerous as decree by ‘thugs'. He says that it is the first time that he has been hated by these united forces, but he welcomes their hatred. Source E was written by a Republican opponent of the New Deal that clearly damned the New Deal. He says the deal is taking away far too much of ‘their' money (the tax-payers) in an attempt to reap equality he also says that this is a defiance of all the ideas upon which our civilisation has been founded. He also says that the cautious with money are being taxed while the lazy poor simply inherit. I think that source E is the most reliable source to see how popular was, because it is written by an opponent to FDR and his laws but still says how much FDR is helping to ‘relieve, recover and reform' those badly affected by the Great Depression. By doing so, it proves that those affected by the Great Depression and those left jobless were greatly helped by Roosevelt and were very fond of him as a president, whereas the republicans and the rich businessmen did not like him at all. So, taking into account that almost everyone in America was affected by the Great Depression and were looking for a president that would help them out, FDR would have been extremely popular with the general population, excluding the rich, which were at this time a minority. Source E, as written by an anti-FDR citizen shows this, which is why I have chosen source E as the most reliable source. Question 4 – Study sources F and G Which source is more useful for assessing the success of Roosevelt's New Deal? Explain your answer, using details from the source and your own knowledge (8 marks) The source that I think is more reliable on the popularity of Roosevelt as president is source G, I think for the following reasons. Source G shows a table that illustrates the performance of the US economy during the 1930s and from this chart it is clear to see some very important facts about the great depression and how it affected the labour force and the unemployed people of America in the 30s. It is very useful because you can easily see the evidence and Information of the facts of the depression and what the new deal achieved. Source G is more useful than the other source because it shows how successful the new deal actually was, it also allows us to see how much unemployment was reduced and was the new deal actually achieved. Source G shows us that that when the Second World War occurred countries were in high demand of manufactured goods and that is how America was lifted out of the depression. It also shows us that the graph on source G shows us that the new deal continually needed money to be pumped into it in order to stop the situation getting any worse and hopefully improve it. Source F shows us that the new deal made many citizens happy. Therefore source F shows us how successful the new deal was at gaining popularity from the cartoon, though this is not reliable evidence and a cartoon on the from of an NRA song book can not prove to us that that was the impression of Roosevelt though we can speculate. Source F shows us popularity and is not particularly accurate as it was an artist's impression and the artist that drew the cartoon would have been commissioned so they would have been made to embellish. Source F is not really an accurate source to analyse Roosevelt's success. It is not useful because it just shows people marching and shows Roosevelt's popularity with the people. The two sources show two different types of success of the new deal. but. Source F shows us how successful the new deal was but it is not useful like source g.. Source F does not show us how successful the new deal was it just shows us that it had popularity†¦ Source G therefore shows us more things and is therefore more useful and it is more reliable than source f. Source G shows so much more than source F and is therefore more useful in showing how successful the new deal was and what it achieved. Question 6 – study all of the sources and use your own knowledge. The following are two different views of Roosevelt: (i) He was a great leader, who inspired his country More sources support the interpretation that Roosevelt was a great leader than that he was an inconsistent president. The evidence that supports the interpretation that Roosevelt was an inconsistent president was unreliable. Source C is attacking the New deal. This source is unreliable because many of the newspaper owners were hostile to Roosevelt. Source E is also attacking the New deal but his is unreliable because an opposition of Roosevelt wrote it and it was written at a time when Roosevelt was unpopular. Also sources J and I are attacking Roosevelt but these are also unreliable. From this I can say that the evidence that says that Roosevelt was an inconsistent president is unreliable. From the evidence that suggests that Roosevelt was a good president there are still unreliable sources. An unreliable source A because it could have been written by anyone who supported Roosevelt. Source B is an inaccurate source because we do not know who Drew the carton. Source d is also unreliable because Roosevelt himself wrote the speech. Source F is unreliable because people who supported Roosevelt drew it. But Source G is reliable because it is a government document and therefore unlikely that it would be inaccurate. Source H is reliable because an historian wrote it and therefore the historian would have a balanced opinion because he would have analysed lots of evidence and he was not intimately involved with the depression. From this there are two pieces of evidence that are reliable and support the statement that Roosevelt was a great leader. The best-supported interpretation is that Roosevelt was a great leader, who inspired his country, relieved poverty and distress and dealt with the depression in an imaginative way.

Essay about The Theme of Loneliness in Of Mice and Men by...

The Theme of Loneliness in Of Mice and Men by John Steinbeck This essay will describe the way loneliness is shown in Of Mice and Men. Most of the characters are lonely and the only thing that keeps them alive is their dreams. Some of the loneliest characters we come across in the novel are Candy, an old man with only one hand, Crooks, a black cripple and Curleys Wife, a woman who has no name; she is lonely even though she is married. Although they are all on the ranch together, they are lonely because of who they are and their history. Of Mice and Men is a story with many different themes and characters. George Milton and Lennie Small are friends who travel together. They both share the†¦show more content†¦They whole ranch appear to be a bit jealous of them to, because most of them only have themselves and no one else. People who appear to be very jealous are people such as Crooks, Candy, Curleys wife and maybe Slim are jealous of their relationship. Although both George and Lennie are close friends, they are still lonely because they are not very similar. Lennie is lonely in the sense that there is no one who is as simple-minded as he is, however he does not realise this, as he is too busy playing with his pup. When George and Lennie first arrive on the ranch, they are met by Candy. Candy and his dogs relationship are a bit like George and Lennies relationship. In the same way, that Candy gets comfort in his dog, Lennie seeks comfort in George. Candy has a parental role towards his dog, just as George has a parental role towards Lennie. Lennie can be compared with the dog because he listens, but does not talk; this obviously makes him good for people to talk to, and share their feelings. Both Lennie and Candys dog are shot by the same gun (Carlsons luger). This makes them very similar, and is a goof comparison. He aint no good to you Candy. An he aint no good to himself. Whynt you shoot him Candy? His suggestion is good for the other men in the bunk- house but he doesnt seem toShow MoreRelatedLoneliness as a Key Theme in ‚Äà ²of Mice and Men‚Äà ´ by John Steinbeck1002 Words   |  5 PagesI believe that the novel does have a large focus on the theme of loneliness as this feature plays a key rà ´le in the lives of every character and is a key attribute to the time in which they live. The loyalty and friendship of George and Lennie stands out in this harsh environment and I feel that it is that friendship in contrast with the rest of society in the novel that makes the book so fantastic. Steinbeck was born on February 27, 1902. During summers he would work as an itinerant worker onRead MoreOf Mice and Men by John Steinbeck973 Words   |  4 PagesIntroduction: I. Background A. John Steinbeck was born on February 27th, 1902 in Salinas, California. 1. Salinas River was one of the few centers for shipping, farming, and agriculture a. John Steinbeck worked as an employed laborer, digging canals and working beside men similar to characters in his novels. 2. In a discussion John Steinbeck said, I worked in the same country that the story is laid in. The characters are composites to a certain extent. Lennie was a real person. Hes in an insaneRead MoreEssay on Theme of Loneliness in John Steinbecks Of Mice and Men1136 Words   |  5 PagesThe Theme of Loneliness in Of Mice and Men      Ã‚  Ã‚   In the novel, Of Mice and Men John Steinbeck used George and Lennies relationship and the theme of hope to point out the loneliness in the novel. The novel starts off and is set in Soledad which means lonely. At the beginning they get a job working on a farm together. Lennie is a little retarded and has great physical strength that isnt too controllable. As they work from ranch to ranch, Lennie relies on George for guidance and help. RatherRead MoreThe Theme of Loneliness in John Steinbecks Of Mice and Men Essay870 Words   |  4 PagesThe Theme of Loneliness in John Steinbecks Of Mice and Men Of Mice and Men, by John Steinbeck, is set in the farmlands of Salinas Valley in California during the 1930’s. At this time there was a world wide depression caused by the Wall Street crash in America. John Steinbeck was born and brought up in Salinas California, he had lived and experienced a life of a migrant worker and that is what inspired him to write this novel (novella?). This meant he could paint a lot Read MoreOf Mice And Men Character Analysis1137 Words   |  5 PagesThe novel, Of Mice and Men, by John Steinbeck, written in 1937. Was placed in The Great Depression, in California. Of Mice and Men is a novel about two men named George and Lennie who have a dream to own a house on the land and have animals and a farm to themselves and Lennie is addicted to soft things. Lennie is all about tending rabbits in this dream they have. It is very rare for a two men to travel together in this time period. Everybodys working for themselves to get money for themselvesRead MoreOf Mice and Men, by John Steinbeck842 Words   |  4 Pagesworking. Men would go far away from their families in search of any jobs they could get, with only themselves to confide in; colleagues only filling in the void of friends and family partially. Naturally, John Steinbeck’s novel Of Mice and Men, written during this period, would reflect this fact as a major aspect of the story. Loneliness would become the sinew of Of Mice and Men, manifested in some of the story’s main characters: Candy, Crooks, and Curley’s wife. These allusions to loneliness are foundRead MoreThemes in John Steinbeck’s Of Mice and Men Essay11 23 Words   |  5 PagesJohn Steinbeck, an American novelist, is well-known for his familiar themes of depression and loneliness. He uses these themes throughout a majority of his novels. These themes come from his childhood and growing up during the stock market crash. A reader can see his depiction of his childhood era. In Of Mice and Men, Steinbeck shows the prominent themes of loneliness, the need for relationships, and the loss of dreams in the 1930s through the novels’ character. Lennie Small, a mentally impairedRead MoreTheme Of Loneliness In Of Mice And Men998 Words   |  4 Pages In Of Mice and Men, John Steinbeck utilizes loneliness as an overarching theme, there is however one character that is noticeably longer than the others in Steinbecks novella. This character is Crooks, a bitter and aloof man, he used to have a family with brothers and a 10 acre chicken ranch. Now he lives the life of a stable buck isolated by his race (he is the only African American on the ranch) among other things (Steinbeck,2002). This loneliness truly characterises him and causes no end toRead MoreTheme Of Loneliness In Of Mice And Men1368 Words   |  6 PagesOf Mice, Men and Loneliness John Steinbeck is the author of the story Of Mice and Men. He grew up in the Salinas River Valley in California, where Of Mice and Men takes place. Steinbeck grew up in 1929 when the Great Depression was going on. Of Mice and Men also takes place during the Great Depression. There were many migrant workers during the Great Depression. Migrant farm workers are men who move around the country working and earning wages and then moving to the next farm. These migrantRead MoreJohn Steinbeck s Of Mice And Men1448 Words   |  6 Pagesnovella, Of Mice and Men, John Steinbeck discusses the idea of loneliness and how people who work at the ranch have no family and no future in lives. He indicates that all people at the ranch are lonely, but he specifically uses a few characters to highlight their state of being lonely and more miserable than the others. He emphasizes the loneliness of ranch life during the Great Depression, and shows how people are willing to try and find friendship in o rder to escape from the state of loneliness. Steinbeck